JohnTommasi.com: The Economics of Unintended Consequences & Common Sense
  • Home
  • Murder Outside the Back Door
  • Murder at the Front Door
  • Danger Zone
  • About/Contact
  • Blog
  • Stock Pick of the week
  • FED Speak

Does the Death Penalty Lead to Higher Costs

1/17/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
      The following is a Judge Roy Bean's decision on the issuance of the death penalty in Texas in the 1880's:

        
Jose Manuel Miguel Gonzales, in a few short weeks it will be spring. The snows of winter will flow away, the ice will vanish, the air will become soft and balmy. The annual miracle of the years will awaken and come to pass. But you will not be there. The rivulet will run its soaring course to the sea. The timid desert flowers will put forth their tender shoots. The glorious valleys in this imperial domain will blossom as the rose. Still you will not be there. From every treetop, some wildwood songster will carol his mating song.  Butterflies will sport in the sunshine.  The gentle breeze will tease the tassels of the wild grasses and all nature will be glad. But you will not be there to enjoy it. Because I command the sheriff of the county to lead you away to some remote spot, swing you by the neck from a knotting bough of some sturdy oak and let you hang until dead. And then Jose Manuel Miguel Gonzales, I further command that such officer retire quickly from your dangling corpse, that vultures may descend from the heavens upon your filthy body until nothing is left but the bare, bleached bones of a cold-blooded, blood-thirsty, throat-cutting, murdering S.O.B.  

Picture
      If it was only that easy.  How many times have you heard someone say (or may be you said it), "Let's just put him to death and get it over with, it'll save the taxpayers money."  As you can see from the chart to the left (click to enlarge), most Americans favor the death penalty and most Americans feel that it is much more expensive to incarcerate someone for life as opposed to putting them to death.
  Take the following case:

Picture
       Dennis McGuire was convicted in 1994 for the rape and murder of 22 year old Joy Stewart, who was seven months pregnant.  The crime was committed in January of 1989 outside of Cincinnati, Ohio.  After raping her, he stabbed her twice.  At his trial (5 years after the crime) he was found guilty and sentenced to death; end of story; right, hardly.  After his defense team exhausted all appeals, he was finally executed on January 17, 2014.  You read that correctly, it took 20 years to finally put him to death and in all that time, he was in maximum security on death row where the cost of incarceration is 2-3 times high of that in the general population.  The cost of incarceration for life is approximately $30,000/year in a state  prison.  The total cost of the Death Penalty; trial, incarceration and appeals is estimated to be anywhere from $3 to 10 million dollars, significantly more than a trial where just life imprisonment is sought.  In the case of McGuire, it took 5 years for the trial where he was found guilty and then the appeals to the Ohio Supreme court, Federal District Court and Federal Appeals Court (the US Supreme Court did not grant Certiorari.  It would have been much simpler and cost efficient to incarcerate him for life.  This now brings up another point is does the death penalty deter murders.  The studies on that are extensive and there is no clear proof one way or the other, particularly if the murder's involve passion, psychosis or a sociopath.

Picture
  Let's now look at a current trial, the Boston Marathon bomber trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.   It has nearly been two years since the bombing and his arrest (April 2013), and they are just now getting around to jury selection and the pool is 1300 long.  What is disconcerting, is the defense team for Tsarnaez has offered a plea deal in the form of life imprisonment in return for a guilty plea.  I have not found any estimates on the cost of the trial, however it will be safe to say that it will be in the millions and the question remains, is society better served by incarcerating Tsarnaev for life or seeking the death penalty.

Picture
         




                                  ADDENDUM  
 My own personal feelings on the death penalty are mixed.  The cop in me want to see murders hung high as an example to others and vindication.  However, the less emotional economist says that incarceration for a life is a no brainer.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    John Tommasi is a retired Senior Lecturer of Economics & Finance from Bentley University and  the University of New Hampshire.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from simone.brunozzi